A COMPARISON OF APPROXIMATE OPTIMAL STRATIFICATION WITH OTHER METHODS OF STRATIFICATION USING PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION
Keywords:
proportional allocation, stratification, optimum stratum boundaries, cumulative frequency, efficiencyDOI:
https://doi.org/10.17654/0972361724060Abstract
One of the main reasons in stratification is to get more accurate estimates by producing gain in the precision of these estimates. To achieve this, we can determine the optimum stratum boundaries. Many procedures were developed to obtain this optimum boundary, and several approximate rules proposed as a result of the complicated calculation involved in solving the theoretical equations to obtain the optimum points of stratification. In this article, we present a comparison between the cumulative $f^{6/7}$ suggested by the authors with other given approximate methods suggested previously. Uniform, right triangular, exponential, normal and chi-square distributions are compared. For certain values of the parameters of these distributions, the cumulative $f^{6/7}$ method is favorable compared with these approximate optimal stratification methods.
Received: May 30, 2024
Accepted: July 11, 2024
References
T. Dalenius, Sampling in Sweden, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1957.
W. Cochran, Sampling Techniques, Wiley, N.Y., 1963.
L. Kish, Survey Sampling, Wiley, New York, 1965.
T. Dalenius and J. L. Hodges, Minimum variance stratification, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 54 (1959), 88-101.
R. J. Serfling, Approximately optimal stratification, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 63 (1968), 1298-1309.
V. K. G. Unnithan, The minimum variance boundary points of stratification, Sankhya 40(C) (1978), 60-72.
G. Ekman, An approximation useful in univariate stratification, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 30 (1959), 219-229.
W. Cochran, Comparison of methods for determining stratum boundaries, Bull. Int. Statist. Inst. 3(2) (1961), 345-358.
I. Hess, V. K. Sethi and T. R. Balakrishnan, Stratification: a practical investigation, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 61 (1966), 74-90.
I. Thomson, Comparison of approximately optimal stratification given proportional allocation with other methods of stratification and allocation, Metrika 23 (1976), 15-25.
R. Singh, Approximately optimal stratification on the auxiliary variable, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66 (1971), 829-833.
P. Lavallée and M. Hidiroglou, On the stratification of skewed populations, Survey Methodology 14(1) (1988), 33-43.
M. M. T. Al-kassab, Approximately optimal stratification using proportional allocation, Tanmeat Alrafideen Journal 41 (1993) pages.
M. M. T. Al-kassab and T. H. Aldaghestani, Using the linear model to find stratum boundaries based on the proportional allocation: a comparative study, Mutah Journal for Research and Studies 1294 (1997), 195-209.
R. Valliant, A. H. Dorfman and R. M. Royall, Finite Population Sampling and Inference: A Prediction Approach, Wiley, New York, 2000.
Heidar Pirzade, S. Sara and Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj, The concept of stratified sampling of execution traces, The 19th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, ICPC 2011, Kingston, ON, Canada, June 22-24, 2011.
G. A. Alsakkal and M. M. Al-kassab, Approximate methods to obtain the optimum stratum boundaries: a comparative study, Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering 7(1) (2021), 197-204.
M. Kozak, Optimal stratification using random search method in agricultural surveys, Stat. Transit. 6 (2004), 797-806.
L.-P. Rivest, A generalization of the Lavallée and Hidiroglou algorithm for stratification in business surveys, Surv. Methodol. 28(2) (2002), 191-198.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pushpa Publishing House, Prayagraj, India

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
____________________________
Attribution: Credit Pushpa Publishing House as the original publisher, including title and author(s) if applicable.
No Derivatives: Modifying or creating derivative works not allowed without written permission.
Contact Pushpa Publishing House for more info or permissions.
Journal Impact Factor: 