CONSTRUCTION AND SELECTION OF STATISTICAL PARAMETERS USING QUICK SWITCHING SYSTEM BASED ON NEUTROSOPHIC SETS - CARDBOARD CAN PRODUCTION INDUSTRY
Keywords:
SSP, QSS, OC, AQL, LQL, neutrosophic Poisson distribution.DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17654/0972361724081Abstract
Quick Switching System (QSS) proposed by Dodge [7] is a sampling system used for the decision in accepting or not the lot while inspecting a series of lots in a manufacturing industry. Based on the past results, QSS may change the number of units inspected and the acceptance criteria in order to give extra protection during the time of poor quality and cost reduction during the time of good quality. On comparing with single, double, chain sampling plan, variable sampling plans and MIL STD 105E switching systems, QSS clinches to be superior in reducing the time and ultimately reduces the cost of inspection with smaller sample size. Due to indeterministic situations, neutrosophic statistics can be applied as an advancement of fuzzy sampling system, when the data may be imprecise, intermediate leading to indecision about the quality of the manufactured product. In this article, QSS with reference to Single Sampling Plan (SSP) using neutrosophic Poisson distribution is as a baseline distribution to determine sample size tightening for various parameters such as AQL and LQL. Operating Characteristic (OC) curves are illustrated numerically using examples.
Received: August 7, 2024
Accepted: October 10, 2024
References
M. Aslam, A new attribute sampling plan using neutrosophic statistical interval method, Complex and Intelligent Systems 5(4) (2019), 365-370.
M. Aslam, A variable acceptance sampling plan under neutrosophic statistical interval method, Symmetry 11(1) (2019), 114.
K. Atanassov, G. Pasi and R. Yager, Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-person multi-criteria decision making, Proceedings First International IEEE Symposium Intelligent Systems, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/is.2002.1044238.
S. Devaraj Arumainayagam and V. Soundararajan, Construction and selection of quick switching double sampling system-acceptance number tightening, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 23(7) (1994), 2079-2100.
S. Devaraj Arumainayagam and V. Soundararajan, Construction and selection of quick switching double-sampling system: sample size tightening, J. Appl. Stat. 22(1) (1995), 105-119.
S. Devaraj Arumainayagam and G. Uma, Construction and selection of quick switching multiple sampling system sample size tightening, Quality Control and Applied Statistics 34(2) (2011), 115-119.
H. F. Dodge, A New Dual System of Acceptance Sampling Technical Report No. 16, The Statistics Center, Rutgers - The State University, New Brunswick, NJ, 1967.
G. Isik and I. Kaya, Design of single and double acceptance sampling plans based on neutrosophic sets, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 42(4) (2022), 3349-3366.
G. Isik and I. Kaya, Design of acceptance sampling plans based on interval valued neutrosophic sets, Soft Computing 27(20) (2023), 14601-14619.
C. Kahraman and I. Kaya, Fuzzy acceptance sampling plans, Production Engineering and Management Under Fuzziness, 2010, pp. 457-481.
C. Kahraman, E. T. Bekar and O. Senvar, A fuzzy design of single and double acceptance sampling plans, Intelligent Decision Making in Quality Management: Theory and Applications (2016), 179-211.
G. I. I. Kaya, Effects of neutrosophic binomial distribution on double acceptance sampling plans, Conference Proceeding Science and Technology, Vol. 3, 2020, pp. 68-76.
D. C. Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, John Wiley and Sons, 2007.
K. Ramya and G. Uma, Determination of quick switching double sampling system by attributes under fuzzy binomial distribution - sample size tightening, ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing 8(1) (2017), 1539-1543.
https://doi.org/10.21917/ijsc.2017.0214.
L. D. Romboski, An investigation of quick switching acceptance sampling systems, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, 1969.
B. Sadeghpour Gildeh, E. Baloui Jamkhaneh and G. Yari, Acceptance single sampling plan with fuzzy parameter, Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 8(2) (2011), 47-55.
F. Smarandache, A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic, Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability: Neutrosophic Logic, Neutrosophy, neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability, Infinite Study, 2005.
W. A. Taylor, Quick switching systems, Journal of Quality Technology 28(4) (1996), 460-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1996.11979704.
G. Uma and S. Nandhitha, Impact of neutrosophic statistics on acceptance sampling, IJAEMA 14(3) (2022), 890-896.
G. Uma and S. Nandhitha, Analyzing and evaluation of quick switching system using neutrosophic Poisson distribution, International Journal of Neutrosophic Science 20(4) (2023), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.54216/ijns.200409.
G. Uma and S. Nandhitha, An investigative study on quick switching system using fuzzy and neutrosophic Poisson distribution, Neutrosophic Systems with Applications 7 (2023), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.28.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pushpa Publishing House, Prayagraj, India

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
____________________________
Attribution: Credit Pushpa Publishing House as the original publisher, including title and author(s) if applicable.
No Derivatives: Modifying or creating derivative works not allowed without written permission.
Contact Pushpa Publishing House for more info or permissions.
Journal Impact Factor: 