.svg){kind=logo}
STATISTICAL INTEGRATION OF QGIS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN BELSAR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
Keywords:
MCDM, sensitivity analysis, rurality index, F-AHP, rural developmentDOI:
https://doi.org/10.17654/0972361725002Abstract
The definition of “rural areas” varies significantly across regions, making the determination of rurality levels crucial for sustainable development and effective policy design. This study introduces a comprehensive rurality index to rank and categorize villages within the Belsar Development Block of Gonda District, India. Utilizing Multiple-criteria Decision-making Methods (MCDMs) such as Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Weighted Product Model (WPM), and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), we developed a robust methodology for this assessment. A thorough sensitivity analysis was also conducted to ensure the reliability of the results. The study identified fourteen critical factors, grouped into five domains: (1) socioeconomic status, (2) education, (3) land use, (4) employment, and (5) healthcare. Based on these factors, villages were ranked and classified into four categories according to their rurality levels, and a detailed rurality map was created with QGIS. The study revealed that the modified F-AHP emerged as the most effective MCDM method for this rurality assessment. Given the systematic execution of this assessment, it can serve as a model for comparative studies in other regions of India and globally, promoting sustainable rural development through informed decision-making.
Received: June 12, 2024
Revised: August 7, 2024
Accepted: August 22, 2024
References
U. P. Directorate of Census Operations, Uttar Pradesh - Series 10 - Part XII A - District Census Handbook, Gonda in Census of India 2011, 2011.
Reserve Bank of India, Guidelines for Identifying Census Centres, Reserve Bank of India Website, 2011.
Reserve Bank of India, Circular DBR. No. BAPD. BC. 12/22.01.001/2016-17, Delhi, 2016.
Kanayo F. Nwanze, IFAD Strategic Framework 2016-2025, 2016.
The World Bank, India at Glance, New Delhi, India, 2021.
A. M. Isserman, In the National Interest: Defining Rural and Urban Correctly in Research and Public Policy, Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 28 (2005), 465-499.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017605279000.
Y. Li, H. Long and Y. Liu, Spatio-temporal pattern of China’s rural development: a rurality index perspective, J. Rural Stud. 38 (2015), 12-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.004.
E. V. Lisova, M. V. Andryiashka, N. V. Ruzhanskaya, O. V. Shugaeva and N. V. Klimovskikh, Risks of socio-economic uncertainty for the well-being of the population: the experience of developed and developing countries, Ecological Footprint of the Modern Economy and the Ways to Reduce It, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2024.
OECD, Creating rural indicators for shaping territorial policy, Paris, France, 1994.
OECD Washington Center, Territorial indicators of employment: focusing on rural development, 1996.
A. A. Gulumser, T. B. Levent and P. Nijkamp, Mapping rurality: analysis of rural structure in Turkey, International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 8 (2009), 130. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2009.026223.
M. Woods, Rural Geography: Processes, Responses, and Experiences in Rural Restructuring, SAGE Publications, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216415.
S. Romano, M. Cozzi, M. Viccaro and G. Persiani, A geostatistical multicriteria approach to rural area classification: from the European perspective to the local implementation, Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 8 (2016), 499-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.055.
Ricardo Ocana-Riola and Carmen Sanchez-Cantalejo, Rurality index for small areas in Spain, Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement 73(2) (2005), 247-266. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-004-0987-3.
S. T. Sliusar, Improving the system of rural territories management in Ukraine, Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice 4 (2018), 522-532. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i27.154163.
N. Galluzzo, An analysis of rurality index in Romanian country side by a quantitative approach, Trakia Journal of Science 16 (2018), 134-139.
https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2018.02.010.
V. Harrington and D. O’Donoghue, Rurality in England and Wales 1991: a replication and extension of the 1981 rurality index, Sociol. Ruralis 38 (1998), 178-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00071.
J. Wisdom and J. W. Creswell, Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models, PCMH Research Methods Series 13 (2013), 1-5.
Mark Velasquez and Patrick T. Hester, An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods, International Journal of Operations Research 10 (2013), 56-66.
A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K. MD Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan and A. Valipour, Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications - a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014, Economic Research- Ekonomska Istrazivanja 28 (2015), 516-571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139.
O. S. Vaidya and S. Kumar, Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169 (2006), 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028.
R. W. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used, Mathematical Modelling 9 (1987), 161-176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
T. L. Saaty, That is not the analytic hierarchy process: what the AHP is and what it is not, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6 (1997), 324-335.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<324::AIDMCDA167> 3.0. CO;2-Q.
P. J. M. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 11 (1983), 229-241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7.
K. Kabassi, Evaluating museum websites using a combination of decision-making theories, Journal of Heritage Tourism 14 (2019), 544-560.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2019.1574301.
K. Kabassi and A. Martinis, Sensitivity analysis of PROMETHEE II for the evaluation of environmental websites, Applied Sciences 11 (2021), 9215.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199215.
L. A. Zadeh, Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 90 (1997), 111-127.
O. Sungur and M. Kilinc, Defining and developing a rurality index for Turkey, Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis 14 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2022.14.1.7.
E. Prieto-Lara and R. Ocana-Riola, Updating rurality index for small areas in Spain, Soc. Indic. Res. 95 (2010), 267-280.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9459-0.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Creating Rural Indicators for Shaping Territorial Policy (93 p., ill.), OECD Publications and Information Centre, 1994.
I. Tomashuk, Problems and prospects of management of rural development, Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 3 (2017), 214-220.
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-5-214-220.
M. Yurdakul and Y. Tansel IC, Application of correlation test to criteria selection for multi criteria decision making (MCDM) models, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 40 (2009), 403-412.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1324-1.
A. Palacio, B. Adenso-Diaz and S. Lozano, A decision-making model to design a sustainable container depot logistic network: the case of the port of Valencia, Transport 33 (2015), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1107621.
K. Margatina, C. Baziotis and A. Potamianos, Attention-based conditioning methods for external knowledge integration, Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019, pp. 3944-3951.
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1385.
R. Ocana-Riola and C. Sanchez-Cantalejo, Rurality index for small areas in Spain, Soc. Indic. Res. 73 (2005), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-0987-3.
C. Weinert and R. J. Boik, MSU rurality index: development and evaluation, Res. Nurs. Health 18 (1995), 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180510.
P. J. Cloke, An index of rurality for England and Wales, Reg. Stud. 11 (1977), 31-46.
Ashutosh Shukla and Hiroko Ono, AHP-PROMETHEE technique for managerial purposes of rural settlements, Kyushu Branch Research Presentation, Japan Society of Architecture, Kyushu, 2022.
Kshitij Dashore, Shashank Singh Pawar, Nagendra Sohani and Devendra Singh Verma, Product evaluation using entropy and multi criteria decision making methods, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 4 (2013), 2183-2187.
E. Roszkowska, Multi-criteria decision making models by applying the TOPSIS method to crisp and interval data, Multiple Criteria Decision Making 6 (2011), 200-230.
D.-Y. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95 (1996), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.
P. Cloke and G. Edwards, Rurality in England and Wales 1981: a replication of the 1971 index, Reg. Stud. 20 (1986), 289-306.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09595238600185271.
J. Zhao, S. Ameratunga, A. Lee, M. Browne and D. J. Exeter, Developing a new index of rurality for exploring variations in health outcomes in Auckland and Northland, Soc. Indic. Res. 144 (2019), 955-980.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02076-1.
A. Shukla and H. Ono, Urban-rural continuum in the Gonda district, India: quantifying rurality using modified fuzzy AHP, Urban Science 8(4) (2024), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8040168.
S. T. Sliusar, Improving the system of rural territories management in Ukraine, Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice 4 (2018), 522-532.
https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i27.154163.
S. M. Habibi, H. Ono and A. Shukla, Geographical information system (GIS) based multi-criteria decision analysis for categorization of the villages: in the case of Kabul new city villages, Urban Science 5 (2021), 65.
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5030065.
Ashutosh Shukla and Hiroko Ono, A knowledge-based technique of ranking and categorizing villages for monitoring and management purposes, National Conference on Humanity and Social Sciences 2022, Ministry of Rural Development India, Varanasi, India, 2022.
A. Shukla, A. K. Vishwakarma, H. ONO and M. S. Habibi, Using quantum GIS for real-time monitoring of groundwater quality: a case study of Gorakhpur City, India, Indian J. Sci. Technol. 14 (2021), 2472-2482.
https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v14i30.410.
S. A. Oyewole and J. M. Haight, Determination of optimal paths to task goals using expert system based on GOMS model, Comput. Human Behav. 27 (2011), 823-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.007.
M. Blanc, La ruralite: diversitedes approches, Economie Rurale 242 (1997), 5-12.
J. Malczewski, GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview, Prog. Plann. 61 (2004), 3-65.
Aliye Gulumser, Tuzin Baycan and P. Nijkamp, Measuring regional creative capacity: a literature review for rural-specific approaches, European Planning Studies 18 (2010), 545-563. 10.1080/09654311003593614.
A. Gessert, J. Nestorova-Dicka and I. Snincak, The dynamics of tourist excursion ratios in Slovakia show caves from 2000 to 2014, Geogr. Tidsskr.-Dan. J. Geogr. 118 (2018), 173-183.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pushpa Publishing House, Prayagraj, India
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
____________________________
Attribution: Credit Pushpa Publishing House as the original publisher, including title and author(s) if applicable.
No Derivatives: Modifying or creating derivative works not allowed without written permission.
Contact Pushpa Publishing House for more info or permissions.
Journal Impact Factor: 
