Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences (FJMS)

The Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences (FJMS) publishes original research papers and survey articles in pure and applied mathematics, statistics, mathematical physics, and other related fields. It welcomes application-oriented work as well.

Submit Article

ASSESSING HOMOGENEITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR ROBUST STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Chrisantus Bongbeebina
  • Mezbahur Rahman

Keywords:

homogeneity of variance, Barlett’s test, Welch’s test, Levene’s test, O’Brien’s test, Brown-Forsythe’s test, Cochran’s test, Fligner-Killeen’s test, robustness, power of the test

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17654/0972087125009

Abstract

Homogeneity of Variance (HOV) is a fundamental assumption in statistical analysis, particularly in parametric tests such as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). To make sure our research findings are solid and we avoid any mistakes in our conclusions, it is crucial that the variability among the groups or conditions we are comparing is about the same. While several tests for assessing homogeneity of variance exist in literature, there lacks consensus on their robustness, especially in scenarios where the assumption of normality is not met. The purpose of this simulation study is to evaluate the performance of nine tests for the homogeneity of variance assumption in one-way ANOVA models in terms of Type I error (also robustness) and statistical power. These tests are analyzed through six different shaped distributions: normal, logistic, exponential, beta, Burr and t-distributions. The results from these studies suggest that three O’Brien tests and the Fligner-Killeen test (nonparametric) demonstrate superior Type I error control across all conditions, indicating better performance compared to other tests.

Received: August 13, 2024
Revised: September 16, 2024
Accepted: October 3, 2024

References

M. S. Bartlett, Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 160 (1937), 268-282.

Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/96803.

J. V. Bradley, Robustness? British J. Math. Statist. Psych. 31 (1978), 144-152.

M. B. Brown and A. B. Forsythe, Robust tests for the equality of variances, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69 (1974), 364-367. doi: 10.2307/2285659.

W. G. Cochran, The distribution of the largest of a set of estimated variances as a fraction of their total, Annals of Eugenics 11 (1941), 47-52.

doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1941.tb02271.x.

H. Levene, Robust tests for the equality of variance, Contributions to Probability and Statistics, I. Olkin, ed., Palo Alto, Stanford University Press, CA, 1960, pp. 278-292.

R. G. O’Brien, A simple test for variance effects in experimental designs, Psychological Bulletin 89 (1981), 570-574. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.89.3.570.

J. W. Tukey, Some elementary problems of importance to small sample practice, Human Biology 20 (1948), 205-214.

Published

2025-05-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ASSESSING HOMOGENEITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR ROBUST STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. (2025). Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences (FJMS), 142(2), 139-171. https://doi.org/10.17654/0972087125009

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.