Advances and Applications in Discrete Mathematics

The Advances and Applications in Discrete Mathematics is a prestigious peer-reviewed journal indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI). It is dedicated to publishing original research articles in the field of discrete mathematics and combinatorics, including topics such as graphs, coding theory, and block design. The journal emphasizes efficient and powerful tools for real-world applications and welcomes expository articles that highlight current developments in the field.

Submit Article

CONNECTED DOM-FORCING PROPAGATION TIMES IN GRAPHS

Authors

  • P. Susanth
  • Charles Dominic
  • K. P. Premodkumar

Keywords:

zero forcing number, dom-forcing number, connected propagation time, connected dom-forcing propagation time

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17654/0974165826006

Abstract

A zero forcing set $D_f \subseteq V(G)$ in a graph $G$ is called a dom-forcing set if $D_f$ is also a dominating set of $G$. The minimum cardinality of such a set is known as the dom-forcing number of the graph $G$, denoted by $F_d(G)$. If the subgraph induced by a dom-forcing set is connected, then it is called a connected dom-forcing set of the graph $G$. The minimum cardinality of such a set is called the connected domforcing number of $G$, denoted by $F_{c d}(G)$. The propagation time of a connected dom-forcing set of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of steps required to force all vertices to become black, starting from the vertices in the connected dom-forcing set and performing independent forces simultaneously. The connected dom-forcing propagation time of a graph is the minimum of propagation time taken over all minimum connected dom-forcing sets of the graph. We discuss the minimum connected dom-forcing propagation time of the graph $G$. Additionally, it delves into the precise determination of minimum connected dom-forcing propagation time for certain well-known graphs. Also, we characterize the class of graphs that admit connected dom-forcing propagation times $|V(G)|-1$ and $|V(G)|-2$.

Received: September 28, 2025
Revised: November 8, 2025
Accepted: November 14, 2025

References

[1] AIM Minimum Rank-special Graphs Work Group, Zero forcing sets and the minimum rank of graphs, Linear Algebra Appl. 428(7) (2008), 1628-1648.

[2] Allan Frendrup et al., An upper bound on the domination number of a graph with minimum degree 2, Discrete Math. 309(4) (2009), 639-646.

[3] Baby Chacko, Charles Dominic and K. P. Premodkumar, On the zero forcing number of graphs and their splitting graphs, Algebra Discrete Math. 28(1) (2019), 29-43.

[4] Samir K. Vaidya and Nirang J. Kothari, Domination integrity of splitting graph of path and cycle, International Scholarly Research Notices 2013(1) (2013), 795427.

[5] Hein van der Holst et al., Zero forcing parameters and minimum rank problems, Linear Algebra Appl. 433(2) (2010), 401-411.

[6] Leslie Hogben et al., Propagation time for zero forcing on a graph, Discrete Appl. Math. 160(13-14) (2012), 1994-2005.

[7] M. Khosravi, S. Rashidi and A. Sheikhhosseini, Connected zero forcing sets and connected propagation time of graphs, Transactions on Combinatorics 9(2) (2020), 77-88.

[8] P. Susanth, Charles Dominic and K. P. Premodkumar, Dom-forcing sets in graphs, 2024. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00580.

[9] P. Susanth, Charles Dominic and K. P. Premodkumar, Connected dom-forcing sets in graphs, Advances and Applications in Discrete Mathematics 42(7) (2025), 713-736.

[10] Nathan Warnberg, Positive semidefinite propagation time, Discrete Appl. Math. 198 (2016), 274-290.

[11] Tassos Dimitriou, Sotiris Nikoletseas and Paul Spirakis, The infection time of graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 154(18) (2006), 2577-2589.

[12] S. Teresa Arockiamary, Total edge irregularity strength of diamond snake and dove, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 109 (2016), 125-132.

[13] J. Anitha, Zero forcing in snake graph, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering 7(5S2) (2019), 133-136.

[14] A. N. Hayyu et al., Resolving domination number of helm graph and it’s operation, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing 1465(1) 2020, pp. 12-20.

[15] Dona John, Charles Dominic and Jobish Vallikavungal, Further results on the 3-consecutive vertex coloring number of certain graphs, IEEE Access 12 (2024), 144164-144173.

[16] I. Javaid et al., On the zero forcing number of corona and lexicographic product of graphs, 2016. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04071.

[17] Eric W. Weisstein, Connected domination number, MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConnectedDominationNumber.html.

[18] S. N. Daoud and K. Mohamed, The complexity of some families of cycle-related graphs, Journal of Taibah University for Science 11(2) (2017), 205-228.

[19] E. Sampathkumar and H. B. Walikar, The connected domination number of a graph, J. Math. Phys. Sci. 13 (1979), 607-613.

[20] Daniela Ferrero et al., Note on power propagation time and lower bounds for the power domination number, J. Comb. Optim. 34(3) (2017), 736-741.

[21] Jesse Geneson and Leslie Hogben, Expected propagation time for probabilistic zero forcing, Australas. J. Combin. 83 (2022), 397-417.

[22] P. A. CrowdMath, Propagation time for weighted zero forcing, 2020. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07316.

[23] Joshua Carlson et al., Throttling positive semidefinite zero forcing propagation time on graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 254 (2019), 33-46.

[24] Z. Rameh and E. Vatandoost, Some Cayley graphs with propagation time 1, Journal of the Iranian Mathematical Society 2(2) (2021), 111-122.

Published

2026-01-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CONNECTED DOM-FORCING PROPAGATION TIMES IN GRAPHS. (2026). Advances and Applications in Discrete Mathematics, 43(1), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.17654/0974165826006

Similar Articles

1-10 of 127

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)