NEW NONPARAMETRIC TESTS FOR LOCATION-SCALE TESTING IN A MIXED DESIGN
Keywords:
Levene transformation, simple tree alternative, location-scale problemDOI:
https://doi.org/10.17654/0972361726002Abstract
A mixed experimental design that combines Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and Completely Randomized Design (CRD) can be structured to get advantages from both types of designs. In some experiments, researchers start with an RCBD plan but they might need to switch to a CRD due to circumstances beyond their control. Data from a mixed design can be analyzed using statistical methods that combine different statistics. In this paper, new tests are developed for testing the differences in mean and variances simultaneously for mixed designs of RCBD and CRD using nonparametric methods. These nonparametric tests are estimated and compared under a symmetric distribution via Monte Carlo simulation.
Received: October 10, 2025
Revised: October 15, 2025
Accepted: December 23, 2025
References
[1] D. Morrison, A test for equality of means of correlated variates with missing data on one response, Biometrika 61(1) (1973), 101-105.
[2] P. E. Lin and L. E. Stivers, On the difference of means with incomplete data, Biometrika 61(2) (1974), 325-334.
[3] G. Ekbohm, On comparing means in the paired case with incomplete data on both responses, Biometrika 63(2) (1976), 299-304.
[4] D. S. Bhoj, Testing equality of means of correlated variates with missing data on both responses, Biometrika 65(2) (1978), 225-228.
[5] S. Dubnicka, R. C. Blair and T. P. Hettmansperger, Rank-based procedures for mixed paired and two-sample designs, Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 1(1) (2002), 32-41.
[6] R. C. Magel and R. Fu, Proposed nonparametric test for the mixed two-sample design, Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice 8(1) (2014), 221-237.
[7] R. Magel, J. Terpstra, K. Canonizado and J. I. Park, Nonparametric tests for mixed designs, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 39(6) (2010), 1228-1250.
[8] S. Olet and R. Magel, A comparison of nonparametric tests in a mixed design for the simple tree alternative, International Journal for Research in Business Management and Accounting 3(3) (2017), 1-23.
[9] R. Magel and M. Ndungu, Nonparametric tests for ordering in completely randomized and randomized block mixed designs, Journal of Biometrics and Biostatistics 4(4) (2013), 20.
[10] Y. Lepage, A combination of Wilcoxon’s and Ansari-Bradley’s statistics, Biometrika 58(2) (1971), 213-217.
[11] M. Neuhauser and L. A. Hothorn, Parametric location-scale and scale trend tests based on Levene’s transformation, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 33(2) (2000), 189-200.
[12] M. Neuhauser, A.-K. Leuchs and D. Ball, A new location-scale test based on a combination of the ideas of Levene and Lepage, Biom. J. 53(3) (2011), 525-534.
[13] H. Levene, Robust tests for equality of variances, Contributions to Probability and Statistics, I. Olkin et al., eds., Stanford University Press, 1960, pp. 278-292.
[14] M. B. Brown and A. B. Forsythe, Robust tests for the equality of variances, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69(346) (1974), 364-367.
[15] F. Khalawi and R. Magel, Proposed nonparametric tests for the simple tree alternative for location and scale testing in a mixed design, International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 11(60) (2022), 60-68.
[16] F. Khalawi and R. C. Magel, Location and scale testing in mixed design, International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics 8(1) (2023), 88-94.
[17] SAS Institute Inc. SAS® 9.3 Foundation and CALL Routines: Reference, SAS Institute Inc., 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pushpa Publishing House, Prayagraj, India

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
____________________________
Attribution: Credit Pushpa Publishing House as the original publisher, including title and author(s) if applicable.
No Derivatives: Modifying or creating derivative works not allowed without written permission.
Contact Pushpa Publishing House for more info or permissions.
Journal Impact Factor: 